STR vs LTR Comparison
Side-by-side annual cash flow analysis: short-term vs long-term rental strategy.
How the STR vs LTR Comparison Works
The comparison panel puts both strategies side by side on the same expense basis. STR expenses (platform fees, cleaning, higher utilities) are factored against LTR's simpler structure (vacancy, fixed expenses). The premium badge shows the annual difference clearly.
- STR column: gross revenue, platform fees, cleaning, operating expenses, cash flow
- LTR column: annual gross rent, vacancy loss, fixed expenses, cash flow
- Premium badge shows exact $ difference per year
- Updates live when you edit monthly rates or LTR rent
When LTR Wins
STR isn't always better. Markets with low tourist demand, high STR regulation, or heavy management burden can make long-term renting the smarter play. This tool shows you the math before you commit.
- Know the break-even occupancy needed to beat LTR
- Factor in management time and effort (management fee %)
- Compare the same property under both scenarios
- Make the decision with numbers, not guesses
Sample Output
See what this feature calculates for you.
STR vs LTR Comparison
STR Annual Cash Flow
$18,600
LTR Annual Cash Flow
$9,200
STR Premium
+$9,400
Occupancy Required
48%
Ready to Use STR vs LTR Comparison?
Get access to this feature and everything else in Short-Term Rental (Airbnb) Projector.